雅思考试范文

在雅思考试中，作文想要提高的话，范文的积累是必不可少的。

雅思考试范文-环境保护谁来负责：

Pollution, ranging from black smokes in major cities to Ozone layer in Antarctic ocean, has been presented to us. Its prevalence has also generated a controversial issue about who should pay for the debt as a result of it. It is argued by some that business and the general public should take responsibility instead of government. I personally agree with this statement for two reasons.

The cleaning up campaign will be more thorough if individuals and businesses pay those pollution bills. As research have indicated, the majority of pollutions in the world are produced by those profit-maximizing business and individual industrial liquid public. Therefore, it would be a sound lesson for them to memorize if they were asked to pay for the cleaning fees. More importantly, the underlying left over in the future.

Governments could certainly make more effort to reduce air pollution. They could introduce laws to limit emissions from factories or to force companies to use renewable energy from solar, wind or water power. They could also impose ‘green taxes’ on drivers and airline companies. In this way, people would be encouraged to use public transport and to take fewer flights abroad, therefore reducing emissions.

Individuals should also take responsibility for the impact they have on the environment. They can take public transport rather than driving, choose products with less packaging, and recycle as much as possible. Most supermarkets now provide reusable bags for shoppers as well as ‘banks’ for recycling glass, plastic and paper in their car parks. By reusing and recycling, we can help to reduce waste.

To sum up, in terms of above-mentioned causes, I strongly believe that all three factors should be responsible for pollution, regarding their abilities, purposes and wills, to different extents.

雅思考试范文-商品生产与环境问题：

Pollution, ranging from black smokes in major cities to Ozone layer in Antarctic ocean, has been presented to us. Its prevalence has also generated a controversial issue about who should pay for the debt as a result of it. It is argued by some that business and the general public should take responsibility instead of government. I personally agree with this statement for two reasons.

The cleaning up campaign will be more thorough if individuals and businesses pay those pollution bills. As research have indicated, the majority of pollutions in the world are produced by those profit-maximizing business and individual industrial liquid public. Therefore, it would be a sound lesson for them to memorize if they were asked to pay for the cleaning fees. More importantly, the underlying left over in the future.

Governments could certainly make more effort to reduce air pollution. They could introduce laws to limit emissions from factories or to force companies to use renewable energy from solar, wind or water power. They could also impose ‘green taxes’ on drivers and airline companies. In this way, people would be encouraged to use public transport and to take fewer flights abroad, therefore reducing emissions.

Individuals should also take responsibility for the impact they have on the environment. They can take public transport rather than driving, choose products with less packaging, and recycle as much as possible. Most supermarkets now provide reusable bags for shoppers as well as ‘banks’ for recycling glass, plastic and paper in their car parks. By reusing and recycling, we can help to reduce waste.

To sum up, in terms of above-mentioned causes, I strongly believe that all three factors should be responsible for pollution, regarding their abilities, purposes and wills, to different extents.

雅思考试范文-去南极旅游的利弊：

Unknown natural is always brimming with seductive scenery. Plenty of researchers and travelers make trips to distant natural places, such as the Mount Qomolangma, Antarctica and the North Pole. I am of the opinion that this has more disadvantages than advantages.

Discover of new areas always bring some irreparable destruction. Before the South Pole is in the sight of public, it was once an uncharted territory. Since its discovery, hundreds of explorers and scientists had taken adventures to this wilderness. At the same time, their scientific expedition may leave some geographical environment destruction there. And it is quite troublesome to make up such destruction.

Although travelers extremely enjoy the breathtaking natural landscape, they bring along tremendous risks. One of the most common phenomenon of travelers is producing pollution to local areas. As reported in many cases, holidaymakers have left behind tons of waste in the Antarctica over the last century. This will not only threaten the survival of many creatures, including endangered species such as penguins and seals, but also cause irreversible damage to the ecosystem.

In addition, we cannot avoid the fact that untouched environments are scientifically proved to have considerable oil and gas reserves.Currently, the world fuel supply is running out in the next fifty years, and no countries will help themselves from the temptation of these fuel sources. The greed of people will drive them to drain out the resource in these regions, and by then places like the South Pole will be truly deserted.

In conclusion, I confirm that travelling to virgin land will bring far more losses than gains.