托福考试综合写作范文

托福综合写作范文可以帮助大家高效备考托福，积累新托福综合写作模板，那你知道托福考试综合写作范文有哪些吗?

托福考试综合写作范文篇一：

The reading passage states that the archaeology in Britain faces a variety of challenges. The professor, however, claims the guidelines,which were established in 1990, have changed the whole situation a lot.

The reading mentions that many construction projects destroyed the valuable ancient artifacts. It declares that the increasing population in Britain has posed a threat to the artifacts. The professor believes people can adopt several approaches to protect these priceless artifacts. She says that the construction sites should be examined by the archaeologists before any construction activities and then a plan could be made up to protect them.

The reading then argues that there is no adequate financial support for archaeological research in Britain. It also states that the financial support, which is influenced by the unstable government priority, is fluky. Nevertheless, the professor counters by saying companies, which are responsible for the construction sites, should pay for the archaeological work done on the sites, so archaeologists finally can do a lot of work with the new finance source.

Finally, responding to the claim that people can not find a career in archaeology, the professor declares that lots of jobs are provided from the guidelines. For example, many archaeology experts are hired all stages of the process to examine the archaeology site, and they can process the data and write reports and articles.

托福考试综合写作范文篇二：

The lecturer states that, although+【阅读观点】 the commonly accepted three theories of birds’ navigation sounds convincing, it suffers from several flaws on various grounds, as is presented below.

The first problem with the navigation theory presented in the text is the lack of substantial evidence[阅读观点]. As is stated in the lecture,+听力的细节 many birds could still navigate at night; therefore they could not navigate by using the sun as compass, since there is no sunlight at night for their reference. And stars do not help either, as there is only one bird species that is known to navigate by using stars. Therefore the sun and the star could not be birds’ compasses.[听力观点]

[阅读观点]The second flaw concerns birds’ ability to recognize topographical cues. They can remember a certain journey, but only after their previous travels via the same route. The phenomenon that birds that get lost could easily find their way home serves as a crucial example. On the contrary, the theory presented in the text is questionable.

Furthermore, [阅读观点]although birds can sense the earth’s magnetic field, the text ignores a crucial fact that birds could only distinguish north and south[听力观点]. What they could not perform is to find an indefinite destination hidden in complex landscape, which even troubles modern geographical technology, by their simple censoring system. Therefore, birds’ ability to sense magnetic field could not be the explanation for their navigation ability.

托福考试综合写作范文篇三：

Introduction:

In termsof the hypothesis discussed in both the reading and the lecture about why the Mary Rose sank suddenly, the lecturer counters the theoriesin the reading passage.

Body:

To start with / Tobegin with / First of all, the author in the reading holds that +阅读第一论点. However, thelecturer counters that+ 【听力细节】.

Secondly/ Secondof all/ Also , the author in the reading / thereading passage states that + 阅读第二论点. However, the lecture casts thedoubt on something and believes that + 【听力细节】.

Last of all,/Finally,/Inthe end, the author in the reading presents that + 阅读第三论点. On thecontrary, the speaker in the lecture firmly believes that + + 【听力细节】.

托福考试综合写作范文篇四：

In the reading passage, the author raises that reading less literature has caused unfortunate effects on the reading public, the cultural general and literature itself. On the contrary, the professor strongly contradicts with it.

To begin with, according to the reading passage, the author mainly talks about reading less literature cannot provide readers with intellectual stimulation. By contrast, the lecturer disagrees with it and she reasons that a book doesn’t have to be literature to be intellectually stimulating. Science books, history and political analysis aren’t literature but they are often of high quality and some of those books are just as creative and well-written as novels and poems. So don’t assume that someone who isn’t reading literature isn’t reading a good book.

To be followed, the reading passage indicates that the culture is in decline. However, the speaker holds the opposite opinion and she says that people are not just spending less time in literature and they are spending less time with books in general. However, today, there are many culturally valuable material that isn’t written such as a brilliant song and good movie. People are not wasting their time when they listen to good songs and watch good movies. Those non-literal activities will not lower the culture. Even some of those creative forms can speak more directly to contemporary concerns than literature does.

Lastly, the writer in the reading part says that it is the readers’ fault to lead to the less support for literature. By comparison, the listening material presents a totally different opinion that it is the authors’ fault because today’s literature is intended to be difficult to understand. So don’t assume the earlier’s generations of readers would read a lot modern literature today.